Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed cuts to Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources scientists could extend beyond what budget documents have portrayed.
A state law requires that before the DNR can lay off a single permanent staffer, it must let go any limited-term employees or probationary employees with the same job classification.
The governor has proposed to cut 66 positions from the agency, 18.4 of them research scientists from the Bureau of Science Services.
Agency spokesman Bill Cosh confirmed that the DNR notified LTEs who were at risk, but he did not answer questions about how many people the proposed cuts could affect, or how the cuts would affect research.
The science bureau relies heavily upon limited-term employees as a money-saving measure; they do not qualify for tenure, paid holidays, sick leave or vacations. They are considered temporary, but some have worked there for more than 10 years.
According to numbers DNR furnished the Legislative Fiscal Bureau in early May, the science bureau has 95 LTEs — 41 classified as senior research scientists and eight as advanced research scientists. Another 33 are technicians.
George Meyer, a former DNR secretary who now is executive director of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, said the DNR asked the state Department of Administration for an exemption from the LTE termination rule — but was denied.
Cosh did not answer questions attempting to confirm the exemption and obtain related documents.
Layoffs are not certain even if the cuts go through, because people with cut positions may apply for other jobs within the agency, or “bump” less senior staffers and take their jobs.
Cosh said the DNR is working with the at-risk staff “to avoid layoffs.”
Helen Sarakinos of the River Alliance of Wisconsin said the DNR administration has so far failed to explain how the science will continue, for instance whether “at risk” scientists will be offered science positions in other divisions.
“Who is going to do the work? They’re not answering that, and they’re certainly not behaving as if they’re intending to protect the capacity to do that work,” she said.
This story is part of Water Watch Wisconsin, a project examining problems with Wisconsin’s water quality and supply.
The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”
- If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org
- If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram)
- Don’t sell the story — it may not be marketed as an individual product.
- Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.
- Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.
- Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled.
- Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
- If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately.
For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Andy Hall, executive director, at ahall@wisconsinwatch.org
It does not matter what party will be governing. The effects will always be the same. The few rich or in command will exploit the rest of us.
One of the first tenets of Economics is that “resources are limited”. Money is a resource, therefore money is limited.
This is to say that, if money is limited, then for a party to have more, another party needs to have less. While there is nothing wrong with having more, or having less based on merit and accomplishments, I wander how many people need to be poor to create a single Billionaire, Millionaire, etc.
Again, nothing wrong with giving up blood to make someone who deserves richer and richer; but why is that such rich people betray us?
They became rich in the U.S. why is it that they are not keeping their wealth and jobs here, but they are exporting abroad? From state to state, etc?
At what point will people start to demand to the government that some stop needs to be placed to outsourcing and to at-will work agreement? When, “we the people” REALLY march and mandate a change?
So far, we have given in for bread crumbs….. what if we will not use the $ any more, but coin a different currency, and star using it, making those billions useless? Would the billionaires listen then?