Reading Time: 3 minutes

The other day my boss, Andy Hall, responded to an email from the Simpson Street Free Press

This always readable, often impressive paper put out by young people in some of Madison’s poorest neighborhoods had asked Hall about state lawmakers’ surprise move against his group, the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism.

Hall, the Center’s executive director, had a pile of interview requests from all over the nation. Yet he took time to respond to these young journalists.

Around 6 a.m. on June 5, toward the end of a marathon session, the Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee added a provision to the state budget. It called for booting the Center from the University of Wisconsin and barring university employees from “doing any work related to the Center” as part of their duties.

It passed with minimal discussion on a 12-4 party line vote, with Republicans in the majority. It could still be removed by the Legislature or vetoed by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

In his reply to the Simpson Street Free Press, Hall said this provision, for which no lawmaker has claimed credit, would “diminish opportunities for students, who have won state and national acclaim for investigative news coverage they have produced with the Center’s professional staff.”

Moreover, it would “limit the freedoms of faculty members to determine how best to teach their students. And it would potentially reduce the public’s access to information about key issues that is essential to maintaining a strong democracy.”

The Center, which opened in 2009, seeks to increase the quality and quantity of investigative journalism in Wisconsin while training the next generation of investigative journalists. It is nonprofit, nonpartisan and, as readers of this column know, committed to accuracy and fairness. Its goal is to inform, not persuade.

Funding for the Center comes from private grants and donations, all publicly disclosed. It has rent-free access to two small rooms in the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication, in exchange for being a resource to faculty and students.

The Center spends $40,000 a year to hire student interns. It works with journalism classes to produce stories, like a recent series on Wisconsin parks. Its four full-time staff members, myself included, come into classrooms to teach skills, like how to use public databases to track campaign financing.

At a June 6 press conference, I asked state Rep. John Nygren, R-Marinette, whether it should matter to lawmakers that the Center provides what the UW considers to be a valuable role. His answer was no.

“That’s a decision they made,” responded Nygren, the Joint Finance Committee co-chair. “We believe otherwise. That’s why we made the decision we did.”

In recent days, the Center has received an outpouring of support from the UW, journalism groups and others, of all political persuasions.

“Who thought this was a good idea?” demanded Milwaukee radio host Charlie Sykes, calling the move “petty, vindictive and dumb.” He praised the Center’s reporting, which he noted had been cited by conservatives like himself.

State Sen. Dale Schultz, R-Richland Center, had this to say, on Wisconsin Public Radio: “It is the height of arrogance, and everybody who voted for that should be embarrassed. It smacks of the kind of tactics you would expect from Vladimir Putin or Hugo Chavez — not in Wisconsin.”

On the other side are the blogger who referred to the “Center for Investigative Propaganda” and the state lawmaker quoted as saying “a large portion of what they do is hits on conservatives.”

Such statements are demonstrably untrue, as anyone can see from looking at the Center’s work, all of which is archived online. But it is, sadly, part of what young journalists at the UW, and the Simpson Street Free Press, need to learn: Even journalism that aspires to the highest standards of fairness and accuracy can come under attack from people who care about neither.

Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism ( The project, a partnership of the Center and MapLight, is supported by The Joyce Foundation. The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism ( collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Popular stories from Wisconsin Watch

7 replies on “Young journalists get harsh lesson”

  1. Hi, Bill, Just a note to express support for the Center and the freedom of University employees to further its work. I am going from here to the “Donate” page.
    As always, you rock!
    (holder of a Wisconsin journalism degree and, as a former Isthmoid, picky proofreader)

  2. I don’t believe any news organization should have any financial relationship with any government agency. Any news organization that has that kind of relationship with the government cannot avoid a bias whether they are concious of it or not.

    You will feel much better now that you will be self reliable, or based from donors.

    The mainstream media can paint it however they like, I believe the legislature made the correct decision.
    I hope you do not pull my comment down because my opinion is the opposite of yours.

    I greatly respect you as a news agency and you have every right to do what you do, just not within a cozy government-news relationship.

    You now have greater freedom that you can publish whatever you want without making your former “tenants” angry.

    I will say that if this was a right-leaning group, my opinion WOULD NOT change.

    1. But what about the freedom of educators to teach? Participating in this is a great way for students to learn the profession of journalism and that’s what the center does. That’s in fact what they were created to do.

      That they’ve uncovered some things which embarrass you shouldn’t be a factor at all. Your protestation of media bias is itself a bias. You want impartiality? Don’t pass petty, vindictive legislation.

  3. I think the valuable lesson they should learn is that fairness and accuracy are only fair an accurate if they support my view. Facts are mallable and subject to change and frankly there is no such thing as “truth”. Opinions are what matter, because when they are mine they ARE the truth. My reality is the only reality — facts, evidence, or science be damned (especially science). This view is held by most of those in any kind of power, (whether that’s monetary or political) and by those that have little or no curiousity or ability to empathize. Just look at the number of “moral” conservatives that undergo an epiphany when one of their children turns out to be gay.

  4. I think there’s an editing mistake in the last line. Instead of “Even journalism that aspires…” it should read “Especially journalism that aspires…”

    Struggle is the hallmark of investigative journalism. It never will be easy, nor should it be. We all know this.

    Best of luck. You do good work. Ben is right, though, you’re playing with fire when you’re getting government support to watch the government.

Comments are closed.