Wisconsin Watch, a nonprofit newsroom, is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. Sign up for our newsletter for more stories straight to your inbox.
Yes.
Studies have found that machine scanners are more accurate than hand counts. Local election officials also say hand-counting ballots would require more time and resources.
Researchers in a 2018 study comparing two statewide recounts in Wisconsin found that, “Scanning paper ballots produces a more accurate election night count than hand-counting ballots.”
An older study looking at New Hampshire elections between 1946 and 2002 found a 0.5% discrepancy between initial counts and recounts for scanned ballots, but a 0.9% difference for hand-counted ballots.
“Republicans are arguing that humans are more likely than machines to get the count right,” wrote Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Charles Stewart III, who runs the MIT Election Data and Science Lab. “Evidence however, suggests the opposite: Computers — which ballot scanners rely on — are very good at tedious, repetitive tasks. Humans are bad at them. And counting votes is tedious and repetitive.”
Sources
Election Law Journal: Learning from Recounts
MIT Libraries: Using Recounts to Measure the Accuracy of Vote Tabulations: Evidence from New Hampshire Elections 1946-2002
NPR: Hand-counting ballots may sound nice. It’s actually less accurate and more expensive
Washington Post: Why do Republicans want to ban ballot scanners?
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”
- If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org
- If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram)
- Don’t sell the story — it may not be marketed as an individual product.
- Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.
- Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.
- Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled.
- Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
- If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately.
For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Andy Hall, executive director, at ahall@wisconsinwatch.org
