This story is a product of the Mississippi River Basin Ag & Water Desk, an editorially independent reporting network based at the University of Missouri School of Journalism in partnership with Report For America and funded by the Walton Family Foundation. Wisconsin Watch is a member of the network. Sign up for our newsletter to get our news straight to your inbox.
New research gives a rare look at climate attitudes of Mississippi River basin residents and the relationship they have — or don’t have — with one of the world’s most important rivers.
The study, released Monday, was conducted by a team of researchers led by assistant professor Kate Rose at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, also home to the Mississippi River Basin Ag & Water Desk. They surveyed more than 2,300 adult residents from the 10 states that border the Mississippi River, seeking to better understand what people know about environmental issues in the basin.
Only about half of those surveyed were aware their state was in the basin, and 21% correctly said they personally lived in the basin. In Kentucky, for example, just 7.5% of respondents thought they lived in the basin, even though it includes the entire state.
The majority of Wisconsin is in the basin, with most rain or snow ending up in the Mississippi River. The remaining parts drain to Lake Michigan or Lake Superior. About half of Wisconsinites surveyed knew the state was part of the basin, and 39% correctly said they personally lived in the basin.
more from wisconsin watch
Amid PFAS fears, oversimplified warnings could discourage residents from consuming a food central to Ojibwe lifeways.
Maisah Khan, policy director for the Mississippi River Network, said she starts every presentation by showing a map of the basin — pointing out the headwaters and the Gulf of Mexico, explaining the expansiveness of the tributaries that pour in. If people don’t know that they’re in the basin, she said, they can’t grasp that what happens on their stretch of river will affect what happens downstream.
The research points to the need for river scientists and advocates to better communicate what’s going on with the Mississippi, which is essential for wildlife habitat, drinking water and worldwide commerce.
“We know some basic knowledge is lacking … but it’s important that people in those states know a little more about those issues that are affecting their daily lives,” Rose said.
Even when people notice, they may not feel like they have the power to do much.
Khan said that as the impacts of climate change become clearer, like extreme weather, people are starting to worry but don’t feel like they have much control.
“That’s really troubling,” Khan said. “It’s easy to feel hopeless.”
But the study also showed support for policy reform and other solutions to address the basin’s environmental issues.
Wisconsinites care most about pollution, drinking water
The researchers surveyed 229 Wisconsin residents as part of the larger study and broke out two topics for state-by-state results: importance of environmental topics and seriousness of current environmental problems.
- Nearly three-fourths of Wisconsin respondents thought water and water quality were at least moderately important topics, followed closely by climate and weather.
- They thought pollution was the state’s most serious problem, with 63% selecting industrial pollution as at least somewhat serious, and 62% selecting agricultural pollution as at least somewhat serious.
- Drinking water quality, land development and urban pollution were next in line.
- The fewest respondents — though still over half — marked flooding and water availability as at least somewhat serious.
Most in basin believe that climate change is happening
Almost 70% of the survey’s total respondents indicated they believe climate change is happening, with the remainder split evenly between those who didn’t know and those who did not believe it is happening.
They were more divided on the drivers behind climate change and how much scientific consensus there is to support it.
The data is especially notable given that more than 99% of scientists agree that climate change is happening and is largely driven by humans.
Just over half of respondents said human activities were mostly causing climate change, while about 40% said climate change is mostly caused by natural changes in the environment. Nearly 70% said most scientists agree that climate change is happening, but in separate questions, 25% indicated that “there is a lot of disagreement” among scientists, and that “there’s not enough scientific evidence” to determine that it is happening.
These results match up with the most recent national data from Yale University’s climate opinion survey, which last asked American adults in 2021 their feelings on the issue. From those results, 72% of respondents said global warming is happening and 57% believed it is caused by human activities.
A majority of basin respondents, 70%, felt a religious motivation to care – saying they felt they had a responsibility to care for nature as stewards of God.
People worried about the environment support solutions
Almost 60% of respondents said their state is being affected by changes in the environment, and more than half said environmental changes are affecting their local community. Nearly half said they’ve personally experienced adverse effects as a result of those changes, such as increasing extreme weather events.
“If you had asked (about environmental changes) 20 years ago, it would (have been) really different,” said Dominique Brossard, chair of the Department of Life Sciences Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who reviewed a summary of the study’s findings.
“I think it’s promising that people are realizing there are environmental issues impacting their region as a whole,” she added.
In nine of the 10 states bordering the river, more than half worried about the health impacts of environmental changes, with the most people worried in Illinois and Louisiana (about 59% and 58%, respectively).
Younger respondents were more likely to report being worried than older respondents. Overall, most respondents worried about extreme weather, with 88% reporting it as at least a somewhat serious problem, followed by pollution, flooding and water quality.
Respondents overwhelmingly supported policies to protect drinking water and the environment, and the majority supported federal water policies to protect the river. Most said they were willing to support environmental initiatives locally and at the state and federal level.
One such recently proposed initiative is the creation of a multi-state compact to drum up federal support for environmental issues in the river basin, similar to the interstate compact that protects the Great Lakes. Over half of respondents indicated they would support such a compact for the river.
The study also asked about farming practices and how they affect the landscape. A majority of respondents, 64%, agreed that managing environmental issues on farmland is a high priority. About 30% said current farming practices are more detrimental to the environment than beneficial, while roughly a quarter disagreed with that statement.
Respondents largely supported sustainable agriculture practices like grass-fed animal operations and organic farming, but also approved of traditional farming practices like row-cropping.
Willingness to act, resistance to personal responsibility
Almost half of respondents said they would be willing to change personal behaviors to combat environmental changes, such as recycling more or driving less. Their willingness dropped when the proposed actions would have a bigger impact on their wallet.
When it came to who was responsible for environmental issues that impact their regions, more than half of respondents said society as a whole bears at least a moderate amount of responsibility, compared to about 24% of respondents who felt they were personally moderately or greatly responsible. Nearly 60% said environmental issues require systemic solutions, and about half said individual actions can have a large impact on mitigating environmental degradation.
Getting people to care and take action on climate change and environmental issues relies on connecting those broader issues to what’s happening in people’s everyday lives — as Rose puts it, “bringing the local.”
“It is harder and harder to get people to take advocacy actions that don’t have a direct connection to their everyday life or direct local tie-in,” Khan said.
Tying climate change to health impacts, for example, can be an effective way to make people take notice, Brossard said. In Khan’s case, her organization has realized that talking about the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico isn’t motivating people upstream to care about what’s running into the Mississippi River. So they’ve pivoted to discussing how those same pollutants cause beach closures and algae blooms.
And while Khan said that societal and individual actions could work together to yield the greatest impact, she and Brossard agreed that systemic and policy changes could make a bigger dent in the problem.